The Pulsar X2’s flat, centered hump forces a low claw or fingertip position. The Lamzu Atlantis pushes your hand upward with a rear hump that fills the palm. Both weigh around 55 grams. Both use the same PAW3395 sensor. Both cost roughly $95. Yet they feel nothing alike in hand. After weeks of head-to-head use across Valorant, Apex Legends, and endless Kovaak’s scenarios, the winner depends entirely on how you grip a mouse.
> Quick Verdict: The Lamzu Atlantis is the clear winner for relaxed claw and palm-claw hybrid grips because its rear hump provides more stability and control during vertical movements. However, the Pulsar X2 is the better choice for aggressive claw and fingertip users who need maximum micro-adjustment freedom and a lower profile that doesn’t restrict finger placement.
Price Comparison
| Model | Price (USD) | Where to Check |
|——-|————-|—————-|
| Pulsar X2 (Medium) | $94.95 | Check Price on Amazon |
| Pulsar X2 Mini | $94.95 | Check Price on Amazon |
| Lamzu Atlantis (Regular) | $89.99 – $99.99 | Check Price on Amazon |
| Lamzu Atlantis Mini | $89.99 | Check Price on Amazon |
Both mice sit in the sub-$100 bracket. You get a USB-C paracord cable, 1K Hz wireless dongle, and extra PTFE feet in the box. No receiver charging dock, no 4K dongle included at this price — you pay extra for the 4K receiver (around $20 from each brand). Value is nearly identical on paper, so this fight is all about shape and build.
Detailed Feature Comparison
| Spec | Pulsar X2 | Lamzu Atlantis |
|——|———–|—————-|
| Sensor | PAW3395 | PAW3395 |
| MCU | Nordic nRF52840 | CompX CX52850 |
| Max DPI | 26,000 | 26,000 |
| Polling Rate | 1000 Hz (4000 Hz with optional dongle) | 1000 Hz (4000 Hz with optional dongle) |
| Weight | 56 g (±1 g) | 55 g (±1 g) |
| Dimensions (L×W×H) | 122 × 63 × 38 mm | 118 × 63 × 39 mm |
| Main Switches | Kailh GM 8.0 | Huano Blue Shell Pink Dot |
| Side Buttons | 2, left side only | 2, left side only |
| Connectivity | 2.4 GHz wireless, wired (USB-C) | 2.4 GHz wireless, wired (USB-C) |
| Battery Life | Up to 70 hours | Up to 70 hours |
| Coating | Matte, slightly textured | Slightly grippier matte |
| Skates | PTFE, rounded edges | PTFE, slightly thicker, rounded edges |
| Software | Pulsar Fusion (Windows, macOS) | Lamzu software (Windows only) |
Both pack the flawless 3395 sensor. Motion latency? Below 1ms in 1K mode. You won’t feel a difference in tracking. The real separation happens in button feel, scroll wheel tension, and structural rigidity.
Main clicks. Pulsar opts for Kailh GM 8.0s — crisp, light, quick to rebound. They’re excellent for rapid tapping. On our test copy, post-travel was minimal. Lamzu uses Huano blue shell pink dots. These are slightly heavier, more tactile, with a deeper “thock” sound. They feel more premium. Less hollow.
Side buttons. Pulsar’s side buttons protrude enough but sit slightly too far forward for small hands. Lamzu’s are placed a bit lower and further back, easier to reach in a relaxed claw. Both have minimal pre-travel.
Scroll wheel. The X2’s wheel has light, notchy steps. Quiet. The Atlantis scroll is more defined, with louder scroll sounds but zero wobble on our unit. Pick your poison: lighter steps versus tactile precision.
Build quality. Early batches of the Pulsar X2 had side flex and main button wobble. Pulsar’s 2024 “V2” silent revision fixed most of that. Our current medium X2 is solid — zero creaks, no double-clicking after three months of heavy use. The Atlantis arrived flawless out of the box. No flex, no rattle, no button wobble. Lamzu’s QC consistency still edges out Pulsar slightly based on community feedback, but both are now reliable if you’re buying new stock.
User Sentiment
We scoured Reddit (r/MouseReview), Discord servers, and YouTube comments. Here’s the real talk, not marketing:
Pulsar X2 — What users love
– The low, safe shape works for fingertip and aggressive claw.
– Extremely light without holes, so no dust intrusion.
– Kailh 8.0 clicks are crisp and spammable.
– Pulsar Fusion software is clean, no bloat.
Pulsar X2 — Common complaints
– Some users still report double-clicking after months (though less on recent copies).
– Side buttons feel too flat for some.
– Battery indicator is unreliable — LED shows full until it’s almost dead.
– The stock cable is stiff compared to Lamzu’s.
Lamzu Atlantis — What users love
– Impeccable build quality out of the box — no QC lottery.
– Huano pink dots satisfying and durable.
– Stock skates are some of the best, smooth on any pad.
– The rear hump gives locked-in stability for vertical sprays.
Lamzu Atlantis — Common complaints
– The aggressive rear hump hurts fingertip-only grip styles.
– Software is Windows-only; macOS users rely on onboard settings.
– Pre-order drops sell out fast, frustrating availability.
– The matte coating can show fingerprints faster than Pulsar.
The consensus: if shape preference matches, either mouse is endgame. If shape mismatches, you’ll regret the purchase within an hour.
Who Is Each Product For?
Pick the Pulsar X2 if:
– You fingertip or use an aggressive claw with curled fingers.
– You want the lowest possible central hump that doesn’t touch your palm.
– You prioritize micro-corrections and wide vertical freedom.
– You prefer lighter, crisper clicks (Kailh 8.0).
– You need macOS software support.
Pick the Lamzu Atlantis if:
– You use a relaxed claw, palm-claw hybrid, or anything that needs palm support.
– You want a locked-in feel for control and vertical stability.
– You rate build quality above all else — no lottery.
– You love deeper, tactile clicks.
– You want top-tier stock skates and don’t want to buy aftermarket feet.
A quick hand-size note: The Atlantis (regular) is slightly shorter but taller, fitting medium hands better. The X2’s length and low height suit medium to large hands if you fingertip. Both offer Mini versions for small hands.
FAQ
Which mouse is better for claw grip?
Depends on the claw type. Aggressive claw (fingers arched sharply, palm barely touching) — Pulsar X2. Relaxed claw (palm contact on the rear, fingers less curled) — Lamzu Atlantis. The rear hump of the Atlantis forces palm contact, which stabilizes aim but limits fingertip micro-movements.
Do I need the 4K dongle?
For 99% of players, no. The jump from 1000 Hz to 4000 Hz reduces click latency by about 0.5 ms on paper. Noticeable only if you’re sub-1000 ms reaction time in controlled tests. Battery life tanks by roughly 50%. We keep both mice at 1K for daily use. Buy the 4K dongle only if you chase absolute minimal latency and don’t mind charging every two days.
Are the Mini versions just smaller?
Yes, but shape proportions change subtly. The Pulsar X2 Mini shrinks evenly. The Lamzu Atlantis Mini lowers the hump slightly and becomes more comfortable for fingertip. If you have hands under 18 cm length, the Minis are worth considering regardless of grip style.
Can I use these mice wired?
Yes, both come with a USB-C paracord cable. In wired mode, the mouse charges and can be used while charging. The cables are lightweight enough that you won’t feel much drag, though the Lamzu’s cable is slightly more flexible.
Bottom Line
Shape is king. You’ve heard it a thousand times. This comparison proves it. Identical sensor, identical weight, near-identical price. Your grip determines the winner. The Pulsar X2 frees your hand for fast, floating movements. The Lamzu Atlantis anchors it for consistent, steady aim. Test your grip before buying; return policies at Amazon make that painless.
Last updated: April 16, 2025
SoftRanked is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
[IMAGE PROMPT: photorealistic top-down desk setup featuring a Pulsar X2 in white and a Lamzu Atlantis in pink side by side on a black mousepad, natural daylight from a window, coiled USB-C cables partially visible, no text or logos]